These situations are rare and should be based on sound ethical reasons. Sometimes power goes to one's head. Some laws are worth breaking to get our freedom back. April 29, 2019 Andy 0. If we love God and love each other, this not only “fulfills” the original purpose and intent of the Mosaic Law, but also fits with all the teachings and actions of Jesus, and His early followers. We should follow the natural law because it’s not nice to fool mother nature. The rules that are made are for our benefit anyway so why disobey them? Yes, Jesus came to add to the law but we are not justify by the law but by faith in Jesus. In the former, if I had no objection, I would probably do it because of the lack of severe penalties. Laws against violent crime and property crime fall into this category. tags: laws. I'm saying find things in it that we should keep, and find things in it that have been harmful to our society. Civil society would quickly become very uncivil. If we are loving our neighbors, we will not be murdering them, lying to them, committing adultery against them, or coveting what belongs to them. "Follow the money" is a catchphrase popularized by the 1976 docudrama film All the President's Men, which suggests political corruption can be brought to light by examining money transfers between parties. Some things we think are absolutes, that is, we believe we should always obey those laws, and there are other laws we think it is okay to break once in a while, if not all the time. Further, the reinforcement of our belief in the age-old panchayat system, the abolition of the abhorable practices of untouchability, child marriage, sati, dowry etc are typical illustrations of social change being brought about in the country trough laws. ", my answer is simply: NO. The good impulse is the desire to obey God. They are saved by grace through faith, just as the gentiles are. We can't just have a dictator. Or sparking armed anti-government crimes. Biney Koul , April 17, 2018 It is a shame that justice in our democracy is unaffordable, inaccessible and slow.The change will come only when we demand it. Meet the men of Really, guys, are you serious? To follow Jesus is to love what he loved, including the moral law. From this, it is clear that as long as the law of the land does not contradict the law of God, we are bound to obey the law of the land. Some pay taxes and some don’t because tax codes are written by the wealthy for the wealthy. Sometimes power goes to one's head. Then I went off to a conservative university where a set of ridiculously arcane rules were applied capriciously by a couple of sanctimonious, neo-Puritan deans with more arbitrary power than would have been healthy even for good human being. So this is a normative argument, not a claim about the law. Why should I follow the Law? But then there are times when man’s law absolutely goes against God’s law. Serious question. Some governments are corrupt and put laws to enslave and keep people who haven't committed any crime in gaol. What is a liberal? should we follow the law? Or obstruction of justice. Laws created under the Harm Principle are written to protect people from being harmed by others. We follow the law, Alicia. 8 British Laws Queen Elizabeth Doesn’t Have to Follow Juliana LaBianca Updated: Mar. Origin. God has appointed authority over men to bring order to our society, and in bringing order, He has given each of us an opportunity to learn the lesson of how to submit to government. This is a lesson we all must learn, for even Christ is subject to the Father (I Corinthians 15:23-28)! They’ll ask: Is Crito such a cheapskate that he refused to part with a little money to save his friend’s life? Posted Jan 15, 2015 In the United States, it seems like we have laws, rules, and regulations to oversee just about everything. A code that applies to some and not others, and that excuses even the most egregious behaviors of its elites, that isn’t law. Post was not sent - check your email addresses! and do not subscribe to the monkey customs of our lesser cousins. The first statement is plainly false. Is it through birth, or through consent? Decent people should not obey immoral laws. The good impulse is the desire to obey God. I understand that some laws are there to keep you safe but we need democracy and everyone's vote on what's right and what's wrong. Serious question. Aside from “I choose to,” I believe it’s the only answer. Different states have their nurse practice acts (NPA) which are enacted by the state’s legislature. As is so often the case, Walter Williams has strong feelings and compelling analysis. Those who chose to be exempt from established law and rules are setting themselves up for failure. I think that the law is always right because all the Judges and all the courts around the world are always you should always follow the law and of course you should always follow the rules as well ok so yeah my final answer is yes ok ok good bye . 0. Online dating tips and etiquette: is it rude not to reply? Often, the laws of the land are set up so that we will have orderly and peaceful societies. We do see this in some “privileged” persons who think that rules do not apply to them because they are, in some way, special. Note The moral dilemma offered in this lesson is not unlike the famous “Heinz Dilemma” devised by Lawrence Kohlberg, the American psychologist, in the 1950s. 19, 2020 For starters: She can own all the dolphins in the U.K. and you can't. Most rules are put in place to control us. Socrates as well as Dr. Martin Luther King have done this. The old covenant is obsolete, so its laws are no longer required for anyone, and that is why Peter could live like a gentile (Gal. Report Post. The government creates some laws just to control us, For us to live the life they want us to live and it's not right. The 2019 Asshole of the Year is Mitch McConnell. For example, someone might say, "The letter of the law says that he has to pay back the damages, but that … Why We Should Obey the Law. But I’ve always been governed by a sense of fair play that says we can play by whatever rules you like, but rest assured, we’re going to play by the same rules. We live in a “society of laws” where the laws only apply to some people some of the time. Like, next week. We will never sell or share your information without your consent. The veil of ignorance simply states that when someone is born, you cannot choose to whom you born from. Our policies & blueprints These provide a protective layer of procedures, training, and support to ensure we don’t break the law. For the film, screenwriter William Goldman attributed the phrase to Deep Throat, the informant who took part in revealing the Watergate scandal. Yet to live in a civil society, we must have some rules to follow. Before engaging with the substance of Rawls’ argument, the various ‘special features’ of the environment which fair play requires to operate can be attacked from a perspective of political anarchism, which does not necessarily presuppose the legitimacy of the state [2] . In the latter example, I would probably follow the law even if I had no moral objection because the likelihood of getting caught and facing severe consequences is high. St. Thomas Aquinas, Ghandi and Martin Luther King Jr., for example, all thought such laws should be challenged and disobeyed if necessary. It sits at the heart of customer trust in Tesco. Sometimes it's wrong, sometimes it's right. ", we will examine some related questions concerning the Old Testament. Law is a system of rules created and enforced through social or governmental institutions to regulate behavior, with its precise definition a matter of longstanding debate. It changed me. During my undergrad career I went out of my way to violate those rules I mention above several hundred times and I was even guilty of breaking a variety of actual laws (in many cases indirectly – but hey, accessory is still a crime). If we put too much emphasis on rules and the disciplinary consequences of not following them, most of the time they will be followed. The teacher should stress that such actions should not be taken lightly because of the danger of undermining the rule of law, upon which stable democracies depend. However, inasmuch as the authority is not contradicting God's explicit Word, we are to obey. You think that Christians today still must follow what the Mosaic law commands about food. My conclusion: I don’t think I have any obligation to follow the law at present. Explore past honorees in the Scrogues Gallery…, One answer, obviously, is “because I don’t want to go to jail.”. I went from respecting the rules to breaking them every chance I got. Paul proclaims that “the law was our custodian until Christ came, that we might be justified by faith. I leave you to your own conscience. For example, I might have a legal obligation to pay tax in a deeply corrupt state, but not necessarily a moral obligation to do so. Now, even though we still defend the moral laws of the Old Testament, we have to keep in mind that Jesus fulfilled it all. S&R Nonfiction: "62 Questions to Ask a Ghost," by Leanna Lawrence. Like Reply. Anyway, since I get asked "whether a Christian should follow the law" fairly regularly, I thought it would be good for me to "go on record" once again and restate my view on this subject as clearly as possible. Practical Submission. Civil disobedience is now mandatory – Progressive Culture | Scholars & Rogues. They don't care about you. This is demonstrated by the fact that Peter and John did not protest being flogged, but instead rejoiced that they suffered for obeying God (Acts 5:40-42). When Tricky Dick said it, even Republicans knew he was finished. They are given wine and fancy foods to eat. And because of that I think that morality is specific for a ceratain person and that’s why it can’t be outdated. Sinai after they left Egypt (Deuteronomy 4:13, 9:9-10).Deuteronomy 5:2-3 says, “The Lord our God made a covenant with us in Horeb. I think that the law is always right because all the Judges and all the courts around the world are always you should always follow the law and of course you should always follow the rules as well ok so yeah my final answer is yes ok ok good bye. If this is what the view means, then it is not what we usually mean by a claim that something is the law. We can see that there are many examples of the law reflecting morality however there are many other laws/lack of laws that do/don't reflect moral opinions. 7 years ago. Notice how people in power seem to be able to get away with crime *cough* Trump *cough* but if someone gets caught with weed where it's illegal they get sent to jail. But is there more to it? Since childhood, we obey rules. As far asthe law is concerned, criminal conduct … Some fear punishment. 0. Does the Culture Index accurately describe me? By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Simply ignoring all laws and rules invokes anarchy, which goes against our human urges to work socially (humans are a social species). We should follow just laws and rules. The purpose of the Old Testament law is to convict people of our inability to keep the law and point us to our need for Jesus Christ as Savior (Romans 7:7-9; Galatians 3:24). Most laws and rules exist to prevent rights from being unfairly removed from an individual. “In truth, laws are always useful to those with possessions and harmful to those who have nothing; from which it follows that the social state is advantageous to men only when all possess something and none has too much.” ― Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract. But we always follow the law. The first event happened in Canada. There have always been groups of Christians who believe that in order to honor God’s authority in the Old Testament we must continue to obey the food laws and other ceremonial laws, lest we be found in disobedience. The NPA provides the necessary guidance to nursing professionals, and it can do so by establishing a board of nursing (BON) that has the power to develop administrative rules and regulations to make laws more specific. However, there is a clear debate for both sides as to whether or not the law actually needs to reflect morality. To answer the question, "Old or New Testament, Which Should We Follow? Dear Papa John’s: you need to rebrand. Occasionally, laws and rules are put in place that infringe on the rights of individuals. Morality is our own opinion and we don’t always agree with the law. At the end of the day, we all seem to interpret man’s law on our own terms, and in our own way (and really we do the same thing with God’s law). But always, always, follow the rules. Typically, the law tells us what we are prohibited from doing and what we are required to do. Why should we follow rules that don't make any sense and add no benefit to anyone? Instead, it is a normative argument that the law should be something. 2:14). But Prayuth defended his residency in February. The only moral obligation, from where I sit, is to make sure any hypothetical crimes don’t hurt the innocent. On this view, we are not invited tocommit crimes—like murder, or driving uninsured—just aslong as we willingly take the prescribed legal consequences. We don’t always like these rules, since they often mean that someone is telling us what to do, or keeping us from doing what we want. Yet to live in a civil society, we must have some rules to follow. GSS respondents (N = 2,475) were asked, "In general, would you say that people should obey the law without exception, or are there exceptional occasions on which people should follow their consciences even if it means breaking the law?" The law We must always follow the law. If your father is the president not only do laws (and national security rules) not apply to you, trade policies are constructed so as to exempt your businesses. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. To what extent are we – as moral individuals – obliged to obey (or help enforce) bad law? This is "Should We Always Obey The Laws Of The Land (October 31, 2015)" by Mel Bond on Vimeo, the home for high quality videos and the people who love them. One answer, obviously, is "because I don't want to go to jail." Yet as you’ll probably know people don’t always follow the rules. Without prejudice of other reasons, you should follow the law because of the “social contract”. So it’s perfectly reasonable to ask if we should abolish the Supreme Court, or at the very least strip the Court of its ability to overturn laws that it rules unconstitutional. That is, my decision as to whether or not to behave “lawfully” is a practical one, not a social, civic, ethical or moral one. Well everyone should however everyone does at least one small thing that is illegal in there life! Notice the words of Moses in Exodus 19:3-6: Someone following the "spirit of the law" is essentially abiding by the law in question, even if he or she may not be completely following it with the utmost faithfulness. ... 33 Unwritten Rules Everyone Needs To Follow. It is said that the law sets minimum standards of behaviour while ethics sets maximum standards. The theologically correct view is that bacon is victory food that Christians under the new covenant can enjoy to the glory of God. Although ethical people always try to be law-abiding, there may be instances where their sense of ethics tells them it is best not to follow the law. I understand that some laws are there to keep you safe but we need democracy and everyone's vote on what's right and what's wrong. We live in a society where some are allowed to get rich for doing the same thing others are in jail for. Finally, in passively accepting his unjust fate, Socrates will be giving his e… So screw them, Break some of their rules, Be a rebel. Why should I, or you, or anyone else in the United States follow the law? What should we do then? nominate a Supreme Court justice who firmly believes that presidents are above the law. Provided these conditions are met, it logically follows that the duty to obey an ‘unjust law’ cannot be overridden by ‘illegal means’, so long as t… So, in answer to the question, "Should a Christian follow the law (as understood by rabbinical Judaism)? follow the law or to violate the law to uphold their values. The Old Testament law was never intended by God to be the universal law … But times have changed, and I think our laws need to change with it. As soon as the law of the land contradicts God’s command, we are to disobey the law of the land and obey God’s law. I'm not saying scrap the constitution, of course not! In fact, I think political obligations are a broader category of duties than strictly legal obligations. The way I understood Paul’s proclamation that we “should not” follow the Law is by understanding the purpose of the Law, prior to the coming of Christ. I personally agree that law is a good thing but putting an argument to counter all the other arguments make good food for debate. - See if you can answer this Good Wife trivia question! Fair play requires a ‘just constitution’, a ‘constitutional democracy’ and ‘rules’ of a ‘just institution’ [3] . We can't just have a dictator. Even though the law is something else, the Constitution’s original meaning should be the law. There are other grounds of argument for such a … These situations are rare and should … The law may be unjust,immoral, or violative of basic human rights such as the segregation or Jim Crow laws of the South, the apartheid laws of South Africa, or many of the Taliban laws of Afghanistan. It is a more liberal interpretation of a law, and it is often used when certain laws have become somewhat dated. Rules are what keeps us safe and protects us from harm. For example, workplace treatment of others may not violate employer-employee laws but still be unethical, such as forms of cyber-bullying. Aside from "I choose to," I believe it's the only answer. There are rules that you should do whatever the president says to do but what if the president wants to ruin the lives of innocent citizens because they are bound to their bigoted beliefs? Reply. Some laws don't justify good actions Law is not always a good thing to have. Suppose that your conscience condemns you for eating bacon. Categories: American Culture, Crime/Corruption, Politics/Law/Government, United States. Some governments are corrupt and put laws to enslave and keep people who haven't committed any crime in gaol. Certainly our governmental authorities are not perfect, nor do they always follow God's plans. You and I are not part of their interests. In the United States, it seems like we have laws, rules, and regulations to oversee just about everything. Reply. I’m thinking today, as I read about our president’s recent activities, about the character of laws, and in particular what moral obligation they impose on me. anything more is overkill. The two can come apart. Without basic Harm Principle laws, a society ultimately degenerates into despotism -- the rule of the strong and violent over the weak and nonviolent.5. Buy at Amazon. You’re making a Nietzsche argument, which has the same general outcome but is fundamentally a different thing morally and ethically. The PM surely doesn’t believe we must always obey the state – he cut his teeth as a young lawyer challenging the British government’s attempt to ban Peter Wright’s Spycatcher in Australia. But what does the Bible Say? I think that we should not follow laws and rules because rules are just dumb and unnecessary ok and no I think that we should not have to follow laws and rules ok because laws and rules are dumb as f**k man ok so yeah my final answer is no. What’s moral and immoral can be a contentious issue, but there are some broad guides for deciding what laws and government actions are immoral. Most laws and rules exist to prevent rights from being unfairly removed from an individual. While noraml law as we know it is only for societies . Rules are made by those of authority to maintain peace and order in a certain area, and so we have to follow them to be able to live happily and safely. Although ethical people always try to be law-abiding, there may be instances where their sense of ethics tells them it is best not to follow the law. Nichiren Daishonin states: “the Buddha wrote in his testament that we should follow the law and not the person, then no matter how good a person he is, if he does not preach in accordance with the sutra, then we must not follow him.” We must not follow any person who does not preach in accordance with the sutra even if he has a high position. Or overtly racist “law enforcement” policies. You may even find yourself in a position to nominate a Supreme Court justice who firmly believes that presidents are above the law, period (at least until they leave office, after the damage is done). We became dead to the Old Law, so that we might be joined to a New Law (Romans 7:4-6). This is the principle we should always follow . Occasionally, laws and rules are put in place that infringe on the rights of individuals. Jesus completed the law, so we follow the 10 commandments (the other 600+ laws were really just for the Israelites, not us) and we do it with love .... law … Moreover, people will wonder why Socrates’ friends didn’t do more to save his life when they had the means to do so. in the act of not following, or breaking a law that they personally have deemed unjust throughout history, or taken part in civil disobedience . the only "law" we need to follow is the one Christ gave us in the NT and that is to love God above all others and to love others as we love ourselves. Following Jesus is not about a list of laws, things to do or not do. To have a political obligation is to have a moral duty to obey the laws and support the institutions of one’s political community.
2020 should we always follow the law